SCP-120
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-120
Expected annual
$22.3M
One-time setup
$9.9M
Annual recurring
$22.1M
Personnel
174
Estimated one-time capital expenditures are roughly $9.86M, primarily for contingency reserves, hardening, equipment, and research lab setup. Recurring annual costs are roughly $22.10M/yr, dominated by Sigma-6 personnel payroll and ongoing contingency/operational spending.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $9.9M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $22.1M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$22.1M/yr
Normal year with routine operations, no major incidents; all recurring budgets cover operations and minimal replenishments.
routine_operations
no_major_breach
🚨
Minor Incident
$23.0M/yr
Localized unauthorized use or small destination compromise requiring targeted MTF response, amnestic usage, and limited repairs.
unauthorized_use_detected
minor_destination_compromise
local_discovery
🚨
Major Breach
$27.1M/yr
Large-scale unauthorized exploitation or multiple destination compromises requiring broad MTF deployments, large amnestic replenishment, infrastructure replacement and major cover operations.
large_scale_unauthorized_use
multiple_destination_compromise
public_exposure
Personnel
174 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 166 | [#1, #2, #3] Sigma-6 operatives and command (136) plus facility static guards (8) and permanent destination guards (22) for 24/7 coverage (#1, #2, #3). |
| Research Scientist | 4 | [#13] Researchers and technical staff supporting testing and monitoring; count used to derive research payroll included in staff_wages (#13). |
| Medical Officer | 2 | [#12, #24] On-call medics for facility and destination posts and psychological/medical follow-up support (#12, #24). |
| Administrative Staff | 2 | [#15, #25] Application processing, records, audits and project administration included in administrative payroll and overhead (#15, #25). |
Confidence Notes
Estimates are order-of-magnitude based on analyst ranges in the notes. Personnel counts, payroll assumptions, and contingency reserve sizing drive large uncertainty; specific contract rates, site-specific costs, and incident frequencies are not provided.