SCP-1701
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-1701
Expected annual
$1.6M
One-time setup
$3.1M
Annual recurring
$1.6M
Personnel
8.5
Initial one-time capital and reserves are substantial (~$3.09M) driven by secure cell construction, incinerator and contingency reserves; recurring annual costs are dominated by staff wages, insurance, replacement/upgrade reserves, and ongoing medical/monitoring costs (~$1.57M/yr).
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $3.1M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.6M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.6M/yr
Normal year with no significant incidents; regular containment, maintenance, monitoring, and medical follow-up occur as scheduled.
no incidents
routine maintenance and monitoring
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.6M/yr
One or a few small activation events produce one or two secondary instances requiring rapid-response capture, incineration, limited medical care and overtime.
single-site activation
localized new-instance incineration
several exposed personnel requiring care
🚨
Major Breach
$3.1M/yr
Large-scale production of many secondary instances requiring mass incineration, emergency mobilization, expanded quarantine and major medical/legal payouts.
mass-instance generation
widespread witness exposure
public safety mobilization
Personnel
8.5 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 6 | [#8] Two guards per shift, three shifts (6 total) to provide 24/7 on-site security; salaries modeled per-guard at ~$45k each (pre-benefits). |
| Quick Reaction Tech | 1 | [#8] Single on-call quick-reaction technician trained in non-visual protocols and remote systems (~1 FTE). |
| Containment Technician | 1 | [#9] Maintenance and systems technician (modeled as 1.0 FTE within recommended 0.5–1 FTE range). |
| Research Scientist | 0.5 | [#9, #14] Fractional research FTE (0.25–0.5 FTE recommended) to run countermeasure experiments and monitor sensor data; modeled at 0.5 FTE. |
Confidence Notes
Estimates use midpoints of provided ranges and standard program assumptions; recurring replacement/reserve choices and contingency sizing introduce significant uncertainty but core staffing and equipment needs are well-defined.