SCP-2232
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-2232
Expected annual
$514K
One-time setup
$369K
Annual recurring
$501K
Personnel
4
One-time containment and research fit-out is modest (~$369k) driven by lockers, RF shielding and research tooling; recurring costs are dominated by personnel and research/ops (~$501k/year).
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $369K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $501K/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$501K/yr
Normal, uneventful year with routine operations, training and occasional small research tasks.
scheduled research
routine maintenance
no containment incidents
🚨
Minor Incident
$531K/yr
Localized incident (e.g., unintended activation or short-term unattended charging) requiring medical attention, equipment replacement and cleanup.
unattended charging
small containment breach
localized equipment damage
🚨
Major Breach
$751K/yr
Significant containment failure similar to Incident-2232-01: room contamination, staff injury, neutralisation of an instance, emergency entry and decontamination.
charging-room catastrophic activation
storage-room expansion of avian tissue
multiple injuries / decontamination required
🚨
Catastrophic Breach
$1.5M/yr
Severe, high-cost event causing extensive site damage, multiple casualties, long remediation and legal exposure.
multi-room contamination
structural damage
major public exposure
Personnel
4 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Certified Bird Handler | 1 | [#7] Required to be present for any use; fully loaded cost included in staff_wages. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 1 | [#8] On-site supervision during charging/use; part of staff_wages estimate. |
| Mobile Forensic Engineer / Research Scientist | 1 | [#14, #25] Handles firmware/OS analysis and ongoing technical research; included as a fully loaded salary in staff_wages. |
| Research Analyst | 1 | [#10, #25] Supports research program, training and data analysis; included in staff_wages. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide detailed line-item ranges making infrastructure and personnel estimates reliable, but many items (research intensity, choice between contracting vs in-house analysis, imaging purchase vs per-scan) are discretionary and represented by midpoints, so uncertainty remains.