SCP-2969
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-2969
Expected annual
$1.9M
One-time setup
$7.1M
Annual recurring
$1.8M
Personnel
12.5
Initial one-time setup is dominated by a large contingency reserve and construction/retrofit costs (totaling several million USD); annual operations are driven by staffing, long-term research, security, and opportunity costs (~$1.78M/yr).
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $7.1M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.8M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.8M/yr
Normal year with routine operations and no significant incidents.
no incidents
routine maintenance
scheduled research
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.9M/yr
Sensor failures, small containment anomalies, or brief localized operational disruptions requiring MTF/repair and limited overtime.
sensor/hardware failure
brief localized breach response
limited overtime & repairs
🚨
Major Breach
$3.8M/yr
Significant containment breach or escalation requiring full MTF deployment, extended site lockdown, repairs, legal response and public-relations expenses.
containment breach
large-scale MTF operation
site disruption & legal exposure
🚨
Memorization Event Major Expansion
$11.8M/yr
SCP-2969 memorizes passages or containment protocols fail in a way that produces permanent/expanded radius, necessitating mass evacuation, major remediation, and long-term relocation.
SCP memorizes passages
permanent radius expansion
mass evacuation / prolonged remediation
Personnel
12.5 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / Site Guards | 8 | [#12] 6–8 guards estimated to cover shifts and redundancy (payroll included in staff_wages). |
| Research Scientist | 3 | [#8] Linguistics and behavioral research team (2–3 FTE; budgeted at ~$180k/yr). |
| Daily Reader / Operator | 1.5 | [#4] Primary reader(s) 1.0 FTE with backup/rotation (budgeted at ~$112k/yr; 1.5 FTE recommended). |
Confidence Notes
Line-item estimates are detailed in analyst notes, but significant uncertainty remains due to site-specific construction costs, policy choices (size of contingency reserve), MTF cost-sharing assumptions, and unpredictable anomalous escalation risk; contingency/reserve sizing is particularly discretionary.