SCP-3338
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-3338
Expected annual
$1.0M
One-time setup
$103K
Annual recurring
$983K
Personnel
9
One-time startup costs are modest (~$103k) for a single-city program (cover assets, SOPs, kits, office/evidence locker); main recurring driver is personnel and tenant-facing costs (wages, stipends, mapping, legal/incident reserves) totaling roughly $982,700/yr for a 200-instance program.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $103K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $983K/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$983K/yr
Normal year with standard operations for a 200-instance urban program; no major incidents or large legal exposures.
routine bi‑monthly visits
occasional amnestic use
regular admin and upkeep
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.1M/yr
Local PR or legal incident requiring extra PR remediation, several additional amnestic applications and limited tenant relocation assistance.
suspicious inspection reported
small litigated complaint
cluster of demanifestations in a building
🚨
Major Breach
$1.7M/yr
Significant exposure or mishandling causing mass demanifestation, large legal action, multiple amnestic runs and emergency tenant assistance.
major mishandling / mass demanifestation
public exposure / litigation
multi‑instance interaction
Personnel
9 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Local Operative / Field Agent | 4 | [#1, #2, #5] Bi‑monthly in‑person interviews, local visits, tenant interaction and emergency response (1 operative per ~40–80 instances). |
| Project Manager / Project Head | 1 | [#3] Senior oversight for removals/amnestics, research approvals and ethical/legal decisions. |
| Administrative Staff | 1 | [#20, #15] Local office admin to coordinate records, payroll, cover logistics and tenant mapping. |
| Tipline / Triage Staff | 2 | [#7] Staffed bilingual hotline and lead triage/dispatch for leads and incidents. |
| Research Scientist / Coordinator | 1 | [#8, #16] Conducts non‑invasive studies, protocol coordination and ethics liaison. |
Confidence Notes
Estimates use midpoints and a 200‑instance program assumption drawn from the analyst notes; variability is significant for optional policies (cash collection), incident frequency, and per‑city scaling, so uncertainty is moderate.