SCP-3425
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-3425
Expected annual
$1.1M
One-time setup
$1.2M
Annual recurring
$1.1M
Personnel
11
Estimated one-time setup cost ~ $1.18M driven by containment construction and laboratory instrumentation; recurring annual costs ~ $1.07M driven primarily by staff wages (security + research), per-sample analysis, instrument service contracts, and contingency/reserve funds.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $1.2M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.1M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.1M/yr
Normal uneventful year with routine monitoring, scheduled analyses, and no major incidents.
routine monitoring
scheduled sample analysis
no incident
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.1M/yr
Small containment event or distress episode requiring emergency response, limited repairs, and additional analyses.
SCP distress/self-damage
localized fire/metal-fume event
small equipment repair
🚨
Major Breach
$1.3M/yr
Significant containment/structural damage or loss of major equipment requiring major repairs, replacement of instruments, and extensive investigation.
structural damage from movement or impact
large-scale equipment failure
major safety incident
🚨
Research Scale Up
$1.4M/yr
Opportunity or requirement to perform TEM-level characterization, scale experiments, or bring in external high-end services and temporary staff.
demand for TEM/high-end analysis
grant-driven scale-up
discovery prompting expanded testing
Personnel
11 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 6 | [#7] 24/7 security rota (2 guards/shift × 3 shifts) per analyst notes. |
| Research Scientist (senior) | 1 | [#16] Senior researcher leading program (1 FTE). |
| Research Associate | 3 | [#16] Research associates performing experiments and analyses (2–3 typical). |
| Technician / Lab Technician | 1 | [#16, #6] Technician supports instruments, sample prep and performs on-call hourly checks combined with automated monitoring. |
Confidence Notes
Notes provide explicit line-item ranges for most costs (construction, instrumentation, staffing), enabling midpoint estimates; uncertainty remains in staffing model choices (monitoring approach), occasional high-cost incidents, and optional TEM acquisition, so confidence is medium.