SCP-3569
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-3569
Expected annual
$453K
One-time setup
$254K
Annual recurring
$449K
Personnel
4.0
First-year one-time setup is approximately $254,000 driven by containment fit-out, audiovisual/ML equipment, and legal/cover setup; ongoing annual costs are about $449,350/yr driven primarily by staff wages, child welfare, forensic analysis, and contracted expertise.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $254K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $449K/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$449K/yr
Normal year with scheduled testing and no major incidents; all recurring operations proceed as planned.
scheduled_tests
no_incidents
routine_analysis
🚨
Minor Incident
$474K/yr
Small medical or handling incident, additional forensic work, short investigation and remediation.
minor_injury
unexpected_hazardous_spawn
extra_analysis/investigation
🚨
Major Breach
$599K/yr
Serious incident involving harmful spawned item causing hospitalization, extended investigation, legal costs, and temporary ramp-up of containment.
severe_injury
hazardous_spawn_behaviour
extended_research_lockdown
🚨
Political Exposure
$649K/yr
Partial public exposure or politically sensitive discovery requiring extensive memetic/PR suppression, settlements, and large-scale cover operations.
media_leak
external_investigation
political_group_involvement
Personnel
4.0 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Research Scientist (Level-3) | 0.5 | Senior researcher oversight (prorated across tests); salary burden included in staff_wages [#4]. |
| Technician / Handler | 2 | Two technicians to prepare room, handle SCP-3569, and log spawned items; salaries included in staff_wages [#5]. |
| Medical Officer / Pediatric Nurse | 0.5 | Pediatric medical presence on-call/prorated for tests; salary estimate included in staff_wages [#6]. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 1 | Guard assigned to testing windows and access control; salary included in staff_wages [#9]. |
Confidence Notes
Estimates are based on analyst itemized ranges and mid-point assumptions; staffing FTE allocations, assumed test frequency, and spawn-rate assumptions drive uncertainty. Costs for unusual anomalous escalation or new site creation are not modeled and would increase uncertainty.