SCP-4919
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-4919
Expected annual
$2.3M
One-time setup
$1.5M
Annual recurring
$2.3M
Personnel
14
Estimated one-time capital and conversion costs are approximately $1.47M, driven by renovations, decommissioning contingency, and lab setup; annual operating costs are approximately $2.28M, driven primarily by staff wages, on-site security, legal/cover-story expenses, and contingency top-ups.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $1.5M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $2.3M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$2.3M/yr
Normal, uneventful year with regular operations and no major incidents.
steady operations
scheduled research
no public breach
🚨
Minor Incident
$2.4M/yr
Localized incident such as a subject psychiatric emergency or a small tourist exposure requiring legal/PR response and medical care.
single serious subject adverse event
small public encounter / journalist inquiry
🚨
Major Breach
$3.3M/yr
Significant public exposure or municipal/legal crisis requiring large-scale mitigation, possible temporary relocation or decommissioning actions.
mass civilian exposure
municipal investigation / legal action
Personnel
14 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Research Scientist | 4 | [#6] Cognitive/psych/neurology staff (two senior, two junior assumed) conducting experiments and analysis. |
| Medical Officer / Nurse | 1 | [#6] On-site medical professional for monitoring and emergency drug administration. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 6 | [#7] Full-time security guards for 24/7 coverage, enforcing no-sleep policy and rapid-response during tourist hours. |
| Security Supervisor / Shift Lead | 1 | [#7] Senior security staff for coordination and incident management. |
| Facility Manager / Administrative Staff | 1 | [#6] Site manager handling logistics, vendor relations and administrative tasks. |
| Lab Technician / Research Support | 1 | [#3, #20] Technical support for sleep-lab equipment, EEG setup and sample handling. |
Confidence Notes
Estimates are medium confidence: many line items (salaries, utilities, basic equipment) are well-bounded, but Paris-specific factors (heritage compliance, municipal fees, public exposure risk) and contingency sizing introduce uncertainty.