SCP-547
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-547
Expected annual
$1.5M
One-time setup
$1.2M
Annual recurring
$1.5M
Personnel
6
One-time setup costs are modest but a material contingency reserve is recommended; the dominant ongoing expenses are staff wages, research, D‑program maintenance, and long‑term care for exposed subjects. Baseline annual operating costs are roughly $1.47M with episodic breach scenarios driving multi‑million spikes.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $1.2M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.5M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.5M/yr
Normal year with controlled operations, occasional small research activities, no containment incidents.
no_incident
planned_research
routine_staffing
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.6M/yr
Localized accidental exposure (one or a few staff/test subjects) requiring rapid response, short-term inpatient care, legal/PR activity, and additional testing.
accidental_exposure
limited_quarantine
small_legal_response
🚨
Major Breach
$4.3M/yr
Containment failure resulting in multiple (dozens) of exposures requiring large-scale institutionalization, extensive legal action, and crisis response.
multiple_exposures
public_disclosure
large_scale_medical_response
🚨
Public Misinformation Large
$6.5M/yr
High-severity public leak requiring extensive misinformation, legal settlements, and national-level crisis management.
public_leak
subpoenas
media_exposure
Personnel
6 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Principal Investigator | 1 | Lead researcher; salary included in staff_wages (part of #7). |
| Senior Researcher | 2 | Senior scientific staff focusing on neurocognitive/memetics research; salaries included in staff_wages (#7). |
| Research Technician | 2 | Lab/tech support for imaging, assays and experimental countermeasure work; salaries included in staff_wages (#7). |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 1 | Minimal dedicated site security coverage (business-hours officer); additional coverage would increase staff_wages (#4). |
Confidence Notes
Input notes provide clear line items and ranges for containment, staffing, and research, allowing a defensible mid-range estimate. Significant uncertainty remains around frequency/severity of exposures, D-program scale, and public/ legal outcomes, which prevents a high confidence rating.