SCP-5806
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-5806
Expected annual
$1.3M
One-time setup
$2.2M
Annual recurring
$1.3M
Personnel
11
Estimated initial one-time setup and acquisition costs are approximately $2.16M driven primarily by site acquisition, escalation contingency, and initial remediation/buyouts; ongoing annual operations cost about $1.26M driven by staff wages (security, site management, researchers), legal/cover operations, and monitoring infrastructure.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $2.2M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.3M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.3M/yr
Normal year with sealed-wing monitoring, no forced entry or major incidents; routine maintenance and research continue.
sealed monitoring
routine maintenance
no unauthorized breaches
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.4M/yr
Localized incident such as attempted unlawful entry, small contamination event, or limited breach attempt requiring site-level emergency response and limited controlled interventions.
attempted unauthorized access
limited contamination
small-scale breaching attempt
🚨
Major Breach
$2.8M/yr
Significant escalation requiring mobilization of wider Foundation assets: large containment teams, facility evacuation/relocation, major medical/legal response, or neutralization attempt.
successful large-scale breach
off-site effects observed
mass casualty/contamination
Personnel
11 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 6 | [#3] Rotating 24/7 on-site armed guard team (6 total to cover shifts). |
| Site Director / Executive Staff | 1 | [#4] Senior site director responsible for daily decisions and liaison with external authorities. |
| Administrative Staff | 1 | [#4] On-site administrator/HR for relocated staff and operations. |
| Research Scientist | 3 | [#21] Dedicated anomaly research team (2–4 recommended; midpoint used) to coordinate experiments, monitoring and reporting. |
Confidence Notes
Estimates combine well-defined operational costs (staff, equipment, routine maintenance) with wide ranges for property acquisition, breach/contingency events, and anomalous-specific interventions; uncertainty about anomaly behavior and contingency mobilization lowers confidence.