SCP-6670
Unknown
~
medium confidence
SCP-6670
Expected annual
$1.4M
One-time setup
$1.5M
Annual recurring
$1.4M
Personnel
12
One-time setup ≈ $1.53M (dominated by a $1.0M incident/response reserve and property/containment upgrades); annual operations ≈ $1.41M/yr driven primarily by on-site staffing (security + research + medical), contracted rapid-response, and ongoing research/containment consumables/maintenance.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $1.5M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.4M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.4M/yr
Normal operational year with no major incidents — standard staffing, maintenance, research and contracts only.
no breach events
routine research and maintenance
normal community relations
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.6M/yr
Localized breach or discovery event requiring increased amnestic use, targeted cleanup, temporary staffing overtime and small contractor engagements.
intrusive civilian investigation
localized decomposition/nuisance odor complaint
small containment breach requiring cleanup
🚨
Major Breach
$2.2M/yr
Significant containment failure or public exposure requiring large-scale remediation, possible controlled demolition, mass amnestization operations, legal defense and use of contingency funds.
structural collapse exposing SCP mass
large public exposure / media attention
fatalities or criminal investigation requiring heavy legal action
Personnel
12 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 8 | [#6] Two guards per shift across 4 shifts (8 total) for 24/7 on-site coverage. |
| Research Scientist | 1 | [#8] Head researcher / PI responsible for monitoring and investigations. |
| Research Technician | 2 | [#8] One to two full-time technicians for sampling, logging and lab work (counted as 2). |
| Medical Officer | 1 | [#9] On-call medical staff/medic trained in amnestic administration and emergency care. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide detailed line-item estimates for capital and operations, so cost structure is fairly well defined; uncertainty remains from anomalous behaviour, local legal exposure, and the discretionary size of contingency spending, so confidence is not high.