SCP-6695
Unknown
~
medium confidence
SCP-6695
Expected annual
$205.4M
One-time setup
$2.2B
Annual recurring
$203.0M
Personnel
210
A conservative, achievable Foundation program focuses on sensing/monitoring, sample-safe analysis, limited probe operations and restrained R&D into replication of observed FTL capability. One-time capital (facilities + equipment + lab/R&D setup) is estimated at $2.25B, itemized for any >$1B elements. Recurring operational costs (staff, maintenance, monitoring, logistics and legal/cover) are estimated at $210M/year. Large-scale interdiction, star-level neutralization, or wholesale containment of an interstellar megastructure at ~50 ly is functionally infeasible for the Foundation under current known capabilities; those are therefore excluded from Foundation operational budgeting and tracked only as systemic risk metrics.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $2.2B
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $203.0M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$203.0M/yr
Conservative monitoring and research posture: prototype probe program, hazardous-sample analysis, sensing R&D and limited FTL-replication experiments. No major incidents.
no_major_incidents
steady_research_progress
limited_prototype_launches
🚨
Minor Incident
$220.0M/yr
Localized operational incident: probe loss (e.g., FLUV-1-class drone destroyed on approach), small sample containment breach with no offsite spread, or limited diplomatic incident requiring replacements and temporary surge operations.
probe_loss
localized_sample_incident
temporary_surges_in_analysis_ops
🚨
Major Incident
$360.0M/yr
Major facility-level breach or high-energy release affecting a Foundation lab or nearby civilian infrastructure requiring emergency remediation, insurance draws, and program pause and reconfiguration.
facility_energy_release
major_contamination_event
civilian_exposure
🚨
Catastrophic External Event
$0/yr
Catastrophic event external to Foundation control (e.g., star destabilization, megastructure collapse or massive, uncontrolled energy discharge affecting multiple systems).
star_destruction
megacivilization-scale_energy_release
Personnel
210 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Research Scientist | 60 | Astrophysicists, particle physicists, materials scientists, exobiologists, and xenolinguists focused on SCP-6695-A characterization and anomalous-sensing R&D. |
| Engineer / Maintenance | 40 | Propulsion, systems, lab, and launch facility engineers; maintenance staff for monitoring arrays and lab rigs. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 40 | Security for hazardous-sample facilities, site protection, and limited rapid-response teams for probe recovery/incident response. |
| Probe Operators / Mission Control | 20 | Flight controllers, telemetry operators and mission planning staff for prototype probe operations and long-duration mission monitoring. |
| Xenolinguists / Exobiologists | 6 | Specialists for contact analysis, translation of received documents/messages, and cultural/diplomatic advising. |
| Site Director / Executive Staff | 6 | Program leads, legal liaisons and policy directors overseeing strategy and classified approvals. |
| Medical Officer | 4 | Radiation/contamination medical specialists to support sample handling and any exposure incidents. |
| Administrative Staff | 18 | Program administration, procurement, logistics coordination and personnel vetting support. |
| Legal / Policy / Public Affairs | 8 | Legal counsel, policy officers and limited public affairs team maintaining cover stories and managing limited disclosure risk. |
| Data Scientists / AI Staff | 8 | AI/ML engineers and analysts for anomalous-signal processing, pattern detection, and translation pipelines. |
Confidence Notes
Medium confidence in the Foundation-operational estimates for a monitoring/research posture. The program is intentionally constrained to achievable measures (sample-safe labs, prototype probes, sensing R&D). Uncertainty remains in (a) the cost and timeline to reproduce or scale the observed FTL coupling from SCP-6695-A, (b) the probability and consequences of major high-energy incidents, and (c) the systemic consequences of trade in 'Tomorrow Diamonds' across other civilizations. Large interdiction/neutralization programs are not costed because they are currently infeasible or speculative; that decision reduces variance in operational budgeting but increases strategic uncertainty regarding long-tail catastrophic risk.