SCP-7899
Unknown
~
medium confidence
SCP-7899
Expected annual
$17.7M
One-time setup
$6.5M
Annual recurring
$17.1M
Personnel
22
One-time setup ~ $6.54M for construction and equipment (BSL‑4 suite, blast doors, robotics, HVAC, power, transport); recurring operations ~ $17.05M/yr driven by security & medical staffing, research programs, field response, long-term care and contingency reserves.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $6.5M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $17.1M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$17.1M/yr
Normal operational year with no major containment failures; routine research, staffing, field patrols and reserves funded.
no breaches
routine field activity
standard research operations
🚨
Minor Incident
$18.6M/yr
Localized accidental activation or small release requiring targeted decon, short‑term surge care, limited public handling and modest remediation.
small containment breach
1–20 external exposures
localized cleanup
🚨
Major Breach
$67.1M/yr
Urban 500 m aerosolization event or major facility breach triggering mass decontamination, large healthcare surge, demolition/soil remediation and extensive litigation/cover operations.
500 m radius aerosolization
mass public exposures
large‑scale environmental remediation
Personnel
22 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 11 | [#12] 24/7 armed security staffing across three shifts (10–12 guards assumed; 11 used here). |
| Medical Officer | 3 | [#13] Specialized medical staff and on‑call emergency physicians (2–4 staff; 3 used). |
| Decontamination Technician | 6 | [#14] Full‑time decon technicians (4–8 technicians; 6 used). |
| Psychological Care / Ethics Staff | 2 | [#15] Psychologists, counselors and Ethics Committee oversight staff (aggregated). |
Confidence Notes
Estimates use midpoints of broad ranges in analyst notes and Foundation policy assumptions; major uncertainties include true frequency of external exposures, number of retained Automatons, and scale of remediation after an urban aerosolization, so medium confidence is appropriate.