SCP-8105
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-8105
Expected annual
$7.7M
One-time setup
$25.2M
Annual recurring
$7.4M
Personnel
32
Initial containment requires sizable capital investment for property acquisition, jammer procurement/installation, and secure lab buildout (~$25M one-time). Recurring costs are driven by staffing (research + security), jammer network maintenance, power, legal/cover operations, and monitoring (~$7.4M/yr).
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $25.2M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $7.4M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$7.4M/yr
Uneventful operational year: normal maintenance, staffing, monitoring, and legal/cover overhead.
normal_operations
routine_maintenance
🚨
Minor Incident
$8.4M/yr
Localized vandalism or multiple jammer site failures requiring emergency replacement and field deployments.
vandalism
vehicle_strike
localized_outage
🚨
Major Breach
$10.9M/yr
Significant discovery or enforcement action requiring intensive legal defense, fines, and emergency containment measures.
federal_enforcement_action
public_exposure
major_legal_defense
🚨
Catastrophic Enforcement
$12.4M/yr
Widespread regulatory/federal action or catastrophic failure forcing major decommissioning, relocation or large fines and capital rebuild.
mass_exposure
forced_decommissioning
major_fines_and_relocation
Personnel
32 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Site Director / Research Scientist | 1 | [#10] Senior scientist / site director covered in core staff wages. |
| Research Scientist / Communications Engineer | 4 | [#10] Communications/EE researchers included in staff wages. |
| Engineer / RF Engineer | 2 | [#10] Senior RF engineers included in staff wages. |
| Lab Technician | 3 | [#10] Lab technicians included in staff wages. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 22 | [#11] 24/7 armed security staffing headcount estimated to match security staffing recurring budget. |
Confidence Notes
Line items and mid-case figures are based on analyst ranges and standard engineering/operations estimates; legal exposure and enforcement/fines remain highly uncertain (pushing confidence down from high). Equipment counts (jammer density) and chosen power architecture are the largest sources of variance.