SCP-8271
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-8271
Expected annual
$1.6M
One-time setup
$2.1M
Annual recurring
$1.5M
Personnel
12
First-year capital costs are roughly $2.105M driven by containment construction, off-unit life-support/vaulting and large sinking/contingency funds; annual operating costs are about $1.544M/yr dominated by staffing (aquatics + security), ongoing research, and contingency reserves/replenishment.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $2.1M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.5M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.5M/yr
Routine year with no significant incidents; containment operating normally and standard maintenance/research/training occur.
no breach
normal staff turnover
scheduled training and maintenance
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.6M/yr
Localized incident where SCP-8271 destroys personal/staff property or small off-unit item requiring modest remediation, replacements and overtime.
staff accidentally bring small valuables near containment
small containment breach of low-value items
minor legal/PR response
🚨
Major Breach
$2.3M/yr
Significant breach or event resulting in destruction of high-value external property, large claims, emergency relocation and major repair/upgrades.
SCP reaches and destroys high-value offsite asset
structural failure requiring major repair
large public exposure requiring legal settlement
Personnel
12 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Aquarist | 2 | [#4] Two full-time aquarists skilled in large freshwater fish; salary assumptions included in staff_wages. |
| Aquatic Veterinarian (0.5 FTE) | 1 | [#4] Veterinary support at ~0.5 FTE; cost included in staff_wages estimate (~$60k prorated). |
| Animal Behaviorist (0.5 FTE) | 1 | [#4] Behavior specialist at ~0.5 FTE for sapience studies; cost included in staff_wages estimate (~$60k prorated). |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 8 | [#5] On-site security staff used in cost estimate (8 guards × base salary + benefits); rotation coverage implied. |
Confidence Notes
Detailed analyst notes provide concrete line-item estimates for most costs (construction, staffing, research), but uncertainty remains around the anomaly's exact value-detection threshold and breach frequency, and the choice to use intentionally low-value in-unit components increases variability in replacement and incident-related costs.