SCP-8446
Unknown
?
low confidence
SCP-8446
Expected annual
$1.6M
One-time setup
$3.0M
Annual recurring
$1.5M
Personnel
5
Initial capital to establish a proactive program (vehicles, monitoring kit, freezers, possible BSL-3 upgrade) is roughly $3.0M one-time; baseline annual operations are ~ $1.48M/yr driven by staff wages, lab testing and PR/legal/contingency. Incident-driven response costs (field response, incineration, remote lift) are the main variable drivers above baseline.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $3.0M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.5M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.5M/yr
Normal year with routine monitoring, occasional small incidents handled with contractors and per-incident responses; no large clusters or containment escalations.
small_clusters_handled_case-by-case
routine_monitoring_and_testing
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.5M/yr
Localized spike in manifestations (several incidents) requiring extra field deployments, increased lab testing and reactive PR/legal work.
localized_cluster
difficult_access / helicopter use
extra necropsies and PR response
🚨
Major Breach
$3.0M/yr
Large-scale cluster or discovery of transmissible/high-risk agent requiring mass-removal, intensive lab campaigns and major legal/PR/coordination costs.
mass_cluster
possible transmissibility / high-risk agent
multi-jurisdictional response
Personnel
5 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Research Scientist / Wildlife Biologist | 2 | Core wildlife biologists (full-time) coordinating field studies and monitoring; included in staff_wages. |
| Veterinary Pathologist | 1 | Part-time/0.5 FTE veterinary pathologist for necropsies and pathology (budgeted as part-time in staff_wages). |
| Program Manager / Coordinator | 1 | Program manager to coordinate investigations, budgets and interagency work; included in staff_wages. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 1 | Baseline security liaison / site liaison (1 FTE) included in staff_wages; per-incident guards budgeted separately. |
Confidence Notes
Costs are based on analyst estimates and many contingent, episodic line items (incident frequency, decision to build BSL-3, scale of clusters). High uncertainty in incident frequency and potential for rapid escalation drives a low confidence rating.