SCP-8609
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-8609
Expected annual
$2.7M
One-time setup
$7.6M
Annual recurring
$2.5M
Personnel
15
Initial one-time capital and retrofit costs are driven by the chlorine trifluoride (ClF3) flood system, hardened deadlocks and emergency "burn" kit; a large contingency reserve is recommended. Annual operating costs are dominated by staff wages, administrative overhead, hazardous-materials stewardship and research/monitoring retainers.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $7.6M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $2.5M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$2.5M/yr
Normal year with scheduled inspections, research, stewardship and no major incidents.
no breaches
scheduled maintenance and training only
🚨
Minor Incident
$2.7M/yr
Localized containment issue (damaged glyphs or small containment breach) requiring specialist call-out, overtime, and limited cleanup.
glyph degradation
localized breach or small-scale contamination
🚨
Major Incident
$5.8M/yr
Use of ClF3 or significant containment failure requiring sector sacrifice, contractor hazardous cleanup and major reconstruction.
ClF3 deployment
major structural damage
multi-week remediation
🚨
Catastrophic Breach
$17.5M/yr
Site-level catastrophic containment failure requiring national-level cover-up, prolonged reconstruction and replacement of the contingency reserve.
full containment collapse
multi-site exposure
federal-level intervention
Personnel
15 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 8 | [#5] Eight guards to provide 24/7 coverage and escorts when SCP-8609 moves (8 guards @ ~$75k fully-burdened = ~$600k/year). |
| Research Scientist | 3 | [#10] Paranormal biologists, linguist/historian, containment scientist FTEs (2–3 FTEs; budgeted at ~$300k/year total). |
| Emergency Response / Burn Team | 4 | [#16] Rapid-response unit/standing team (salaries and readiness pay budgeted at ~$180k/year total). |
Confidence Notes
Line-item estimates are provided by analyst notes and are fairly specific; however the frequency/probability of adverse incidents (ClF3 use, breaches) and the scale of post-incident rebuilds are uncertain, so overall confidence is medium.