SCP-9313
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-9313
Expected annual
$271K
One-time setup
$642K
Annual recurring
$269K
Personnel
3
One-time containment and research setup dominated by a modest facility fit-out and a potential research program; recurring costs are dominated by personnel (technician, security allocation, memetics consultant), ongoing research, medical readiness, and compliance.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $642K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $269K/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$269K/yr
Normal year with no incidents; no major research-driven upgrades or leaks; video monitoring not deployed.
no exposures
no media leaks
no containment upgrades required
🚨
Minor Incident
$279K/yr
One or more small exposure events requiring medical/psychological response and incident investigation.
accidental direct viewing by staff
small localized exposure
minor counseling and overtime for investigation
🚨
Media Leak
$329K/yr
Unauthorized photograph or video of SCP-9313 reaches external parties requiring takedown, legal action, PR, and potential buyouts.
unauthorized image/video leak
public dissemination
legal/PR takedown & buyouts
🚨
Containment Escalation Upgrade
$419K/yr
Research reveals broader transmissibility or delayed effects requiring a higher-security containment upgrade and memetic isolation retrofits.
research shows expanded transmissibility
new long-term effects discovered
need for memetic isolation retrofit
Personnel
3 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Containment Technician | 1 | Part-time assigned technician to perform scheduled checks, power tests, and basic maintenance. (Mapped to #5) |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 1 | Shared/minimal security oversight allocation to prevent unauthorized entry and manage badge logs. (Mapped to #6) |
| Memetics/Psychology Consultant (Contractor) | 1 | Specialist for training and incident support; contractor or allocated staff. (Mapped to #7) |
Confidence Notes
Costs are based on analyst ranges in the notes; many items (research scope, decision to allow video monitoring, frequency of incidents) are optional and broaden ranges, so midpoint estimates were used. Memetic hazards add uncertainty to incident probabilities and required contingency sizes.