SCP-001-LIZ-THE-GM-S-PROPOSAL
Safe
?
low confidence
Liz The GM's Proposal
Expected annual
$14.3M
One-time setup
$13.5M
Annual recurring
$12.6M
Personnel
23
One-time setup costs are dominated by insurance/reserve and contingency funds plus facility/equipment buildout (~$13.5M). Ongoing yearly operations (security, research, legal/cover operations, testing and logistics) are estimated at about $12.6M/year, with episodic incidents potentially adding tens to hundreds of millions.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $13.5M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $12.6M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$12.6M/yr
Normal year with routine operations, sample testing and steady monitoring; no major public incidents or large-scale recalls.
no major exposures
steady sample intake
routine legal/PR activity
🚨
Minor Incident
$14.6M/yr
Localized consumer exposure requiring targeted recalls, additional retrievals, localized amnestic administration and accelerated legal/PR work.
localized product exposure
small consumer panic
targeted recall
🚨
Major Breach
$37.6M/yr
Large-scale distribution discovered or a public incident causing widespread recall, many civilian exposures, major legal action and international retrieval surge.
broad distribution detected
multi-jurisdictional litigation
mass recall operations
🚨
Catastrophic Exposure
$212.6M/yr
Very rare catastrophic year with mass civilian exposures, nationwide panic, massive legal settlements and emergency government-level intervention.
nationwide exposure
mass litigation and public scrutiny
large-scale amnestic campaign
Personnel
23 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 10 | [#3] Front-line 24/7 armed guard coverage (rotating shifts) — included in staff_wages. |
| Security Supervisor | 1 | [#3] Shift/senior supervisor — included in staff_wages. |
| Research Scientist | 12 | [#4] Anomalous/toy research team (materials scientists, cognitive scientists, chemists) — included in staff_wages. |
Confidence Notes
Estimates are low-confidence due to high uncertainty in SCP distribution scale, per-item complexity variance, litigation exposure, and frequency/severity of incidents; many categories have wide ranges and scenario-driven skew.