SCP-046
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-046
Expected annual
$10.0M
One-time setup
$62.3M
Annual recurring
$9.7M
Personnel
50
One-time containment and infrastructure costs are dominated by a large contingency/reserve plus land acquisition and facility buildout (~$62.3M one-time); recurring annual costs are driven by security and specialist staff, aviation and vehicle operations, and research/medical programs (~$9.7M/yr).
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $62.3M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $9.7M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$9.7M/yr
Normal, uneventful year with standard operations and no major incidents.
routine operations
no breaches
standard wildlife activity
🚨
Minor Incident
$10.2M/yr
Elevated animal/prey activity or small containment event requiring extra medevac, repairs and overtime.
increased animal incursions
localized containment breach
extra medevac cases
🚨
Major Breach
$14.7M/yr
Significant containment failure requiring aviation surge, expanded security posture, major remediation and surge research.
breach involving multiple humans/animals
extensive remediation
temporary evacuation of nearby assets
🚨
Catastrophic Breach With Memetic Spread
$34.7M/yr
Widespread memetic exposure or rapidly escalating anomalous activity requiring large-scale emergency escalation and partial use of contingency funds.
memetic dissemination
mass casualties or environmental spread
national-level response required
Personnel
50 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 40 | [#4] 24/7 guard presence across three shifts (30–50 guards estimated). |
| Supervisors | 3 | [#4] On-site supervisory staff included in supervisor/medic line. |
| Medical Officer / On-site medic | 1 | [#4] On-site medic/first responder. |
| Research Scientist | 6 | [#9, #16] Specialists in microbiology/mycology/entomology/botany (4–8 specialists estimated). |
Confidence Notes
Estimates are based on analyst ranges and reasonable midpoints; many costs (land prices, helicopter procurement, contingency needs, and frequency of incidents) are uncertain, and the 50 km full-exclusion scenario would vastly increase both one-time and recurring figures.