SCP-1812
Keter
~
medium confidence
SCP-1812
Expected annual
$268.0M
One-time setup
$3.3B
Annual recurring
$209.2M
Personnel
400
Corrected estimate: Foundation operational one-time costs ≈ $3.317 billion (capital, R&D, amnestic capacity, surveillance, contingency reserves); recurring Foundation operations ≈ $209.2 million/year (personnel, monitoring, censorship/influence, logistics). Systemic (non-Foundation) economic impact of a civilization-scale coastal evacuation is modeled separately and itemized at ≈ $4.6 trillion one-time and ≈ $200 billion/year recurring. This differs materially from the original report by moving global evacuation damages out of Foundation spend and providing itemized contingency and R&D spending instead of an unitemized \$1T+ Foundation line item.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $3.3B
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $209.2M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$209.2M/yr
Routine year with containment kept to authorized personnel; ongoing monitoring, personnel payroll, censorship/influence and readiness activities only.
no_major_leak
routine_monitoring
steady_operations
🚨
Minor Incident
$219.2M/yr
Localized leak or single observatory/photo discovery requiring targeted takedown(s), small amnestic administrations and limited buyouts or legal actions.
single_site_leak
targeted_amnestic_administration
local_buyout_or_takedown
🚨
Major Breach
$3.0B/yr
Knowledge leak reaches ≈1–10% of the global population, forcing Foundation mass amnestic production & global deployment attempts plus major emergency operations.
widespread_public_leak
global_amnestic_deployment
large-scale_logistics_ops
🚨
Catastrophic Breach
$4.4B/yr
Public awareness exceeds 10%; article contingency recommends global coastal evacuation and contemplates kinetic options. At this scale, concealment is effectively impossible and global evacuation is a societal action, not a Foundation-funded operation.
awareness_exceeds_10_percent
global_coastal_evacuations
activation_of_catastrophic_contingencies
Personnel
400 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Research Scientist | 120 | Senior and specialist scientists for memetic research, lab experiments and mission analysis (supports R&D items). |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 120 | Site security, rapid-response teams, enforcement of exclusion zones (>12 km from major water bodies) and field operations. |
| Analysts / Astronomers | 80 | Observatory liaisons, image-sanitization analysts and orbit/tracking specialists (support to monitoring/observatory oversight). |
| Administrative Staff | 35 | Logistics, finance, cover-story coordination and coordination of legal/influence campaigns. |
| Engineer / Maintenance | 25 | Maintain secure facilities, server farms, microsat ground stations and field equipment. |
| Medical Officer | 10 | Hyperbaric/ICU specialists and emergency medical staff for perceptual drowning cases and researcher safety. |
| Site Director / Executive Staff | 5 | Operational leadership and coordination with O5-level oversight. |
| O5 Liaison / High-Clearance Exec | 5 | Direct O5 oversight and liaison to ensure awareness limits and emergency authorizations are enforced. |
Confidence Notes
This re-evaluation corrects the prior report's treatment of catastrophic evacuation as a Foundation expenditure and moves those damages into systemic_economic_impact with itemized components. Large one-time Foundation costs (> \$1B) were broken into explicit subcomponents (amnestic R&D vs manufacturing capacity, probe vs surveillance builds) to comply with itemization rules. Remaining uncertainties: probability assignments for major breaches, per-dose costs and logistical scale of aerosolized Class‑A deployments, and political feasibility of kinetic interdiction — these drive medium confidence in high-end scenario costing. Recurring staffing and monitoring costs are better constrained and carry higher confidence than catastrophic-event estimates.