SCP-2185
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-2185
Expected annual
$1.7M
One-time setup
$8.2M
Annual recurring
$1.5M
Personnel
19
Upfront capital costs are dominated by large contingency and breach reserves plus initial containment/facility outfitting (~$8.2M one-time). Annual operating costs are steady and driven mainly by staffing, research/monitoring, security, and denial/compensation/PR (~$2.06M/yr).
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $8.2M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.5M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.5M/yr
Normal year with no major incidents; routine monitoring, diplomacy and maintenance only.
ongoing diplomacy
routine monitoring
no property-scale incidents
🚨
Minor Incident
$2.4M/yr
Localized flooding event(s) affecting a few properties requiring emergency response, DaC payouts and repairs.
localized property flooding
emergency pump deployments
DaC payouts and repairs
🚨
Major Breach
$8.1M/yr
Significant escalation with widespread flooding, infrastructure damage and long-term remediation requiring tapping of contingency and breach reserves.
widespread flooding
infrastructure failure
large-scale environmental remediation
Personnel
19 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Site Director / Executive Staff | 1 | [#3] Site manager included in site staff wages. |
| Engineer / Maintenance | 2 | [#3] Technicians for pumps/electrical/HVAC. |
| Monitoring Operators | 3 | [#3] 24/7 monitoring/operators to staff dashboard and sensors. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 5 | [#5] On-site armed, amphibious-capable response team (4–6 guards estimated). |
| Negotiator / Diplomatic Team | 3 | [#4] Senior negotiators and support staff for ongoing diplomacy and travel. |
| Research Scientist | 3 | [#11] Research staff (2–4 scientists/technicians) for R&D into control/neutralization. |
| Administrative Staff | 2 | [#25] Program administrative and compliance support included in overhead. |
Confidence Notes
Line-item estimates are based on analyst ranges and typical Foundation budgeting practices; facility and staffing numbers are well-described but incident frequency and required reserve sizing for catastrophic events are uncertain, so confidence is medium.