SCP-2633
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-2633
Expected annual
$3.0M
One-time setup
$2.2M
Annual recurring
$2.9M
Personnel
16
Initial capital expenditure is approximately $2.23M for containment enclosures, HVAC/scrubbing, analytical equipment and a genetics lab; recurring operating costs are roughly $2.91M/year driven primarily by staffing, research/omics, utilities, hazardous‑waste handling and a standing contingency reserve.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $2.2M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $2.9M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$2.9M/yr
Routine year with normal operations, no major incidents; contains staffing, utilities, routine research, consumables and scheduled maintenance.
normal_operations
routine_sampling
scheduled_maintenance
🚨
Minor Incident
$3.3M/yr
Localized exposure, a single small retrieval or containment incident requiring targeted medical response, transport, PR/legal action and overtime costs.
small_release_or_exposure
remote_retrieval
limited_public_exposure
🚨
Major Breach
$4.4M/yr
Significant containment breach or mass‑exposure event requiring large‑scale recontainment, widespread medical response, public remediation and extended legal/cover operations.
facility_breach
mass_exposure
significant_public_disclosure
Personnel
16 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 8 | [#8] 24/7 coverage with 3 shifts + relief; estimated 8 guards assigned to the module. |
| Research Scientist (Lead) | 1 | [#9] Principal investigator / lead parazoologist. |
| Veterinarian | 2 | [#9] Veterinarians experienced with crustaceans; on‑call coverage. |
| Research Technician / Animal Husbandry Technician | 4 | [#9] Technicians for husbandry, monitoring and 24/7 care. |
| Laboratory Specialist / Analytical Technician | 1 | [#9] GC‑MS and omics specialist for sample processing and chain‑of‑custody. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes supply detailed line items and ranges for most costs, allowing medium confidence in order‑of‑magnitude estimates; uncertainty remains for incident frequencies, contingency sizing, site‑specific HVAC costs and scope of a long‑term genetics program, so a high confidence rating is not appropriate.