SCP-2947
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-2947
Expected annual
$285K
One-time setup
$1.7M
Annual recurring
$280K
Personnel
1.5
One-time capital costs are dominated by an optional purpose-built vertical test chamber and containment/HVAC modifications (~$1.7M total one-time). Ongoing annual costs are modest (~$280.5k/yr) and are driven primarily by staffed research wages, administrative overhead, security/on-call coverage, and data/storage/maintenance.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $1.7M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $280K/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$280K/yr
Normal uneventful year with routine testing, maintenance, and no uncontrolled Aoki Events or public proliferation.
routine testing
no containment incidents
standard personnel turnover
🚨
Minor Incident
$306K/yr
Localized accidental Aoki Event inside containment causing equipment damage and minor repairs/replacements.
accidental on-site Aoki Event
minor chamber/instrument damage
small emergency repair/replacement
🚨
Major Breach
$530K/yr
Significant uncontrolled Aoki Event with structural damage, major equipment loss, and extended recovery operations.
large uncontrolled Aoki Event
structural repairs
extensive equipment replacement
🚨
Proliferation Retrieval Operation
$780K/yr
Discovery of converted SCP-2947 instances in public requiring covert/large-scale retrievals or buy-back operations.
widespread public conversion
mass retrieval/buy-back
large covert operations and PR/legal actions
Personnel
1.5 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Research Scientist | 0.5 | 0.5 FTE loaded salary included in staff_wages [#9]. |
| Technician | 0.5 | 0.5 FTE technician for operations and instrumentation [#9]. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 0.5 | 0.5 FTE security/operations coordinator; on-call guards covered separately as overtime [#9, #10]. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide detailed line-item ranges for most categories, but key uncertainties remain (quantity of instances, choice to build a dedicated vertical chamber, size of contingency/reserve and frequency of incidents). Mid-range assumptions were used.