SCP-3192
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-3192
Expected annual
$6.1M
One-time setup
$163.8M
Annual recurring
$5.4M
Personnel
30
One-time capital expenditure is dominated by construction of a 50 m, blast-rated underground bunker; annual operating costs are driven by security staffing, technical monitoring, energy, and legal/cover operations. Expect one-time capital on the order of hundreds of millions and recurring costs in the low single-digit millions per year.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $163.8M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $5.4M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$5.4M/yr
Normal operational year with no major containment incidents; routine maintenance, staffing, and monitoring costs only.
routine_operations
scheduled_maintenance
🚨
Minor Incident
$5.7M/yr
Localized containment breach or unauthorized viewing requiring investigation, overtime, limited equipment replacement and legal response.
unauthorized_viewing
minor_containment_breach
equipment_damage
🚨
Major Breach
$25.4M/yr
Large-scale breach or armed assault requiring emergency response, significant repairs/rebuild, replacement of damaged systems and major legal/liaison costs.
armed_assault
mass_exposure
facility_breach
Personnel
30 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 10 | [#6] Continuous 24/7 guard coverage with shift rotation and overlap. |
| CCTV Operator / IT Support | 8 | [#5, #8, #17] On-site continuous monitoring, recording oversight and IT/alarms support. |
| Research Scientist (Level 4 / high-clearance) | 8 | [#9] Senior personnel with Level 4 clearance who manage restricted information and oversight. |
| Engineer / Maintenance | 4 | [#14, #15, #25] Facilities engineers and maintenance staff for HVAC, lift, generators and routine upkeep. |
Confidence Notes
Line items and ranges are well-defined for operating costs; the primary uncertainty is the one-time capital for a bespoke 50m, 250-ton-TNT-grade bunker (very wide market variance). Historical breach frequency informs scenario probabilities but future governance choices (use of existing military bunkers, diplomatic constraints) could materially change costs.