SCP-3259
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-3259
Expected annual
$12.1M
One-time setup
$14.6M
Annual recurring
$11.9M
Personnel
80
One-time setup costs estimated at $14,550,000 driven by implantation program setup, contingency reserves, LAI development, and safehouse/outfitting. Recurring baseline operations cost approximately $11,875,250/year driven primarily by staff wages (embedded agents and response teams), ongoing R&D/monitoring, and insurance/legal/retainer services.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $14.6M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $11.9M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$11.9M/yr
Normal year with ongoing readiness and no major public exposure or large-scale incidents; only routine monitoring and maintenance occur.
no manifestations or only routine maintenance
no legal/press exposure
🚨
Minor Incident
$11.9M/yr
Single SCP-3259 manifestation requiring field response, amnestic administration, extermination, remediation, relocation, and follow-up services.
single household manifestation
standard DB field response and remediation
🚨
Major Breach
$19.9M/yr
Significant public/legal exposure or simultaneous multiple manifestations leading to large PR/legal settlements, emergency large-scale remediation, and heavy use of contingency funds.
public disclosure or media/legal escalation
multiple simultaneous manifestations requiring large-scale response
Personnel
80 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded Agent / Covert Operative | 40 | [#4, #5] ~30–50 embedded agents placed in public-health agencies; counted here as 40 and included in staff_wages. |
| Disinformation Bureau Response Personnel (medics/interviewers/tactical) | 40 | [#6, #7] Regional DB field teams and response staff (~40 total), salaries and operational costs included in staff_wages. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide detailed line-item ranges and assumptions (manifestation frequency, regional coverage, and equipment/retainer needs) allowing a reasoned mid-confidence estimate; significant uncertainty remains in manifestation frequency, scope of required regional coverage, and potential legal/PR escalation which could materially change recurring and contingency needs.