SCP-3292
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-3292
Expected annual
$3.0M
One-time setup
$3.0M
Annual recurring
$2.9M
Personnel
15
Initial capital costs are primarily land, entrance hardening and contingency (~$3.0M one-time). Annual costs are dominated by staff wages, manual expedition/mapping and research operations (~$2.92M/yr).
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $3.0M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $2.9M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$2.9M/yr
Normal year with routine operations, mapping, research and no major incidents.
routine_field_campaigns
normal staffing/maintenance
🚨
Minor Incident
$3.0M/yr
Localized incident (trespass, small removal attempt) requiring Site-990 processing, extra staff overtime, limited repairs and additional amnestics.
trespasser incidents
small extraction attempts
limited medevac/use of contingency
🚨
Major Breach
$4.1M/yr
Significant escalation (mass egress, large-scale removal attempt) requiring contingency spending, contractor mobilisation, extended operations and major repairs.
mass egress of SCP-3292-3
coordinated removal attempt
major recovery operation
Personnel
15 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / Guards (Level-2, on-site) | 2 | [#5] Two on-site ranger/guard staff stationed outside the entrance. |
| Rapid Response / MTF Security (rotating) | 6 | [#8] Rotating standby team (4–8 personnel) from nearest site for incident response. |
| Research Scientist | 4 | [#15] Dedicated field/research staff (field biologists, botanists, archaeologists). |
| Medical Officer / Medic | 1 | [#22] Medic staffing for field rotations and medical administration. |
| Driver / Transport Specialist | 1 | [#28] Secure transport/drivers for sample transfers to Site-990. |
| Administrative / Cover Liaison | 1 | [#2, #26] Small administrative/cover staff supporting Halcyon front company and records/IT. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide detailed line items and ranges, enabling midpoint estimates; uncertainty remains around land purchase vs lease, expedition intensity, and frequency/severity of incidents, so medium confidence is appropriate.