SCP-4492
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-4492
Expected annual
$278K
One-time setup
$896K
Annual recurring
$241K
Personnel
2.5
One-time setup and research (containment modifications, lab test infrastructure, and a contingency reserve) drive initial costs (~$896,500). Recurring costs (~$241,000/yr) are dominated by staff wages, ongoing research/monitoring, training, and legal/insurance obligations, with large per-incident cleanup/legal exposures possible.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $896K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $241K/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$241K/yr
Normal year with no public activations; containment and planned research continue at baseline levels.
secured_storage
scheduled_research
no_public_activation
🚨
Minor Incident
$253K/yr
Single indoor activation (contained restroom or controlled test) requiring local cleanup, limited medical checks, and small PR/legal handling.
indoor_activation
single_person_exposure
small_cleanup
🚨
Major Incident
$391K/yr
Outdoor/public-area activation or multi-person exposure requiring professional hazmat cleanup, environmental testing, broader medical monitoring, and substantial PR/legal response.
outdoor_activation
public_exposure
environmental_remediation
🚨
Catastrophic Incident
$1.7M/yr
Large-scale public contamination or repeated targeted misuse leading to major remediation, epidemiological response, and multi-million-dollar legal settlements.
widespread_public_impact
agricultural_or_water_contamination
major_legal_liability
Personnel
2.5 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 1 | [#4] Dedicated security coverage (approx. 1.0 FTE @ ~$50k/yr) |
| Research Scientist | 1 | [#11, #10] Ongoing research and characterization support (salary allocation ~$75k/yr; initial research setup is one-time) |
| Security/Monitoring Operator | 0.5 | [#3] Monitoring/tamper-detection allocation (approx. 0.5 FTE equivalent @ ~$25k/yr) |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide ranges and clear line items for containment, operations, and incident responses, enabling a mid-level confidence in magnitude; incident frequency and severity are the primary uncertainties driving lower-than-high confidence.