SCP-5432
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-5432
Expected annual
$306K
One-time setup
$137K
Annual recurring
$294K
Personnel
3
Initial one-time setup is modest (~$137k) for secure cold storage, sensors, and targeted analyses; main recurring drivers are staff wages, administrative overhead, and regular monitoring (~$293.5k/yr). Major cost risk is specialized ontological instrumentation or emergency response.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $137K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $294K/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$294K/yr
Normal year with routine monitoring, staffing, and scheduled maintenance; no incident or major instrumentation purchases.
no incidents
routine sampling only
🚨
Minor Incident
$324K/yr
Localized incident or unexpected degradation requiring emergency retrieval, extra testing, and overtime.
sample degradation
power interruption requiring emergency response
🚨
Major Breach
$594K/yr
Containment compromise or events requiring extensive decontamination, contractor mobilization, legal action, and possible temporary relocation of assets.
containment breach
significant public exposure
🚨
Research Scale Up
$794K/yr
Decision to pursue enhanced scientific program including purchase/development of specialized ontological instrumentation or in‑house mass spectrometry.
research priority escalation
funding approved for capital instruments
Personnel
3 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Research Technician / Custodian | 1 | [#6] Daily/weekly inspections, condition logging, sample handling; salary estimated as one midlevel technician. |
| Research Scientist (PI oversight) | 1 | [#7] Fractional FTE senior researcher responsible for oversight, authorization of sampling and containment decisions (0.1–0.25 FTE represented as one part‑time position). |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 1 | [#8] Rotational guard coverage for area checks and escorted removals (budgeted as ~1 full‑time equivalent through roster rotation). |
Confidence Notes
Many line items are well understood (storage, staffing, PPE), but substantial uncertainty exists around ontological instrumentation, potential decommissioning costs, and the frequency of anomalous events; estimates are mid‑range selections from analyst ranges.