SCP-5496
Unknown
~
medium confidence
SCP-5496
Expected annual
$2.6M
One-time setup
$1.1M
Annual recurring
$2.4M
Personnel
10.5
Initial one-time capital and IT costs are approximately $1.10M driven by insurance reserve seed funding and R&D prototyping; annual operating costs are about $2.39M/yr driven by staff wages, contingency for incident remediation, and productivity losses.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $1.1M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $2.4M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$2.4M/yr
Normal year with no major incidents beyond typical operations; recurring costs only.
steady monitoring
routine tests only
no major incidents
🚨
Minor Incident
$2.5M/yr
Year with several moderate incidents from granted suggestions requiring extra remediation and overtime.
multiple moderate grants
localized equipment damage
additional remediation and overtime
🚨
Major Incident
$3.1M/yr
Significant anomalous event(s) causing extended outages, higher repair costs, and elevated PR/legal spend.
large-scale granted suggestion
facility damage
legal/PR engagement
🚨
Catastrophic Breach
$5.4M/yr
Low-probability, high-impact year with catastrophic cascade requiring capital repairs, extended downtime, and major reserve drawdown.
site-wide cascading failures
extensive structural or system damage
major public exposure risk
Personnel
10.5 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CCTV Monitoring Operator | 6 | [#4] 3 shifts covering 24 feeds (~6 FTEs total). |
| Research Scientist / PI | 1 | [#6] Senior researcher leading SCP-5496 study team. |
| Research Assistant | 2 | [#6] Junior research staff supporting test programs and documentation. |
| Security Liaison | 1 | [#6] Coordination between research team and site security. |
| Administrative Staff (FTE) | 0.5 | [#6] Partial FTE admin support allocated to the SCP-5496 team (0.5 FTE). |
Confidence Notes
Estimates are based on analyst ranges and a mid-sized Site-43 operating assumption (~20 monitored points, ~500 staff). Many line items contain wide ranges (incidents, legal exposure, insurance needs) so totals are approximate; staffing and incident-frequency assumptions drive most variance.