SCP-6629
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-6629
Expected annual
$3.1M
One-time setup
$4.0M
Annual recurring
$3.1M
Personnel
21
Estimated one-time capital/setup ≈ $4,020,000 driven by containment lockers, secure vaulting/transport, remote test chamber, and forensic/lab capital; recurring annual ≈ $2,990,000 driven primarily by staff wages (research and security), contingency, and legal/cover costs.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $4.0M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $3.1M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$3.1M/yr
Normal operational year with standard maintenance, research, staffing, and no major incidents.
no_breach
routine_research
standard_maintenance
🚨
Minor Incident
$3.1M/yr
Localized containment incident causing loss/damage to a small number of units requiring repairs, overtime, and small-scale emergency contracting.
small_breach
unit_destruction
overtime_response
🚨
Major Breach
$4.5M/yr
Significant breach or containment failure causing widespread loss/damage, large emergency response, legal/IO actions, and replacement/repair spending.
large_scale_breach
multiple_unit_losses
emergency_recontainment
🚨
Political Exposure
$5.0M/yr
Public/official exposure or high-level political pressure forcing relocation of SCP-6629-A off-site and expensive vaulting/transfer operations and extended legal containment.
political_scrutiny
official_investigation
forced_relocation_of_SCP-6629-A
Personnel
21 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Research Scientist | 4 | Lead researcher + 3 research scientists/postdocs; mapped to recurring research staffing costs [#14]. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 12 | 24/7 guard coverage approximated as 12 guard positions; part of security staffing [#15]. |
| Security Supervisor | 1 | Supervisor for guard team; included in security staffing estimate [#15]. |
| Containment Technician | 4 | Daily inspections, locker maintenance and specimen handling staff (3–5 technicians; mid-range used) [#16]. |
Confidence Notes
Many line items are explicitly estimated in analyst notes (salaries, lockers, vaults, labs) giving reasonable fidelity, but several choices required assumptions (number of annual transfers, whether forensics are done in-house vs outsourced, precise technician headcount), producing moderate uncertainty.