SCP-683
Euclid
✓
high confidence
SCP-683
Expected annual
$1.0M
One-time setup
$561K
Annual recurring
$1.0M
Personnel
6
One-time capital costs are moderate (~$561k) driven by lab buildout, specialized equipment (generator adapter, dedicated incinerator option) and contingency reserves; recurring annual costs are dominated by personnel/salaries and program support (~$1.01M/yr). Primary ongoing cost drivers are research staff wages, D-class program support, emergency medical reserves and routine lab/consumable expenses.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $561K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.0M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.0M/yr
Normal year with routine research, scheduled tests, and no significant incidents.
scheduled_tests
routine_maintenance
no accidental exposures
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.1M/yr
Small containment incident or accidental exposure requiring medical response, extra autopsies, overtime and limited equipment replacement.
single accidental ingestion/exposure
generator failure during test
limited property damage
🚨
Major Breach
$2.0M/yr
Significant containment failure or repeated/expanded anomalous behavior requiring emergency relocation, large-scale medical care, major equipment replacement and legal/PR expenses.
large-scale exposure
containment system failure
facility evacuation/upgrade
Personnel
6 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Principal Investigator / Research Lead | 1 | [#17] Senior researcher (Level 3+) leading SCP-683 research; salary included in staff wages. |
| Research Scientist | 2 | [#17] Supporting Level 2 scientists involved in experiments and analysis. |
| Lab Technician | 2 | [#17] Technicians for sample processing, histology and experiment support. |
| Electrical Engineer / Consultant | 1 | [#17] Engineer for adapter design, power interface and equipment safety (contracted/allocated FTE). |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide line-item estimates for all major capital and recurring categories (facility buildout, equipment, personnel, medical reserves and consumables). Remaining uncertainty stems from discretionary choices (central incinerator vs dedicated purchase) and low-probability escalation scenarios.