SCP-7051
Unknown
~
medium confidence
SCP-7051
Expected annual
$1.1M
One-time setup
$268K
Annual recurring
$1.1M
Personnel
11
One-time startup capital of approximately $268,500 for a small containment/mitigation program (suite fit-out, sensors, safes, robotic tool) and annual recurring costs of approximately $1,095,000 driven primarily by staff wages, an operating contingency reserve, and ongoing monitoring/maintenance.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $268K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.1M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.1M/yr
Normal year with routine monitoring, enforcement of two-person rule, and no major capture attempts or elevated incident rates.
routine monitoring
no capture attempts
normal staffing and turnover
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.1M/yr
Year with elevated nuisance activity leading to extra overtime, more incident investigations, minor property replacement and short-term psychological support.
frequent object movements
multiple item-loss reports
increased staff stress/psychological incidents
🚨
Research Scale Up
$1.3M/yr
Organization funds an active capture/R&D campaign (robotics, adhesives trials, expanded human-subject testing and oversight), driving substantial one-time and recurring oversight costs.
decision to attempt capture
prolonged R&D and human-subject programs
Personnel
11 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 6 | [#3, #4] 24/7 coverage and enforcement of two-person rule; averaged salary ~$50k each. |
| Research Scientist | 1 | [#5] Senior researcher to lead characterization; salary estimated ~$150k. |
| Research Technician | 2 | [#5] Technicians to run experiments and maintain instrumentation; ~$65k each. |
| Data Analyst | 1 | [#15] Analyst for time-series/log correlation and incident review; salary ~$40k. |
| Psychologist / Medical Officer | 1 | [#6] Part-time or contract psychologist for staff support and human-subject protocol design; budgeted as a ~full-time equivalent for continuity (~$45k). |
Confidence Notes
Estimates are grounded in specific ranges provided by analyst notes (staffing, equipment, and contingency guidance), but many line items have wide ranges and organizational choices (full capture attempt vs mitigation-only) substantially change costs, so medium confidence is appropriate.