SCP-7085
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-7085
Expected annual
$7.0M
One-time setup
$12.3M
Annual recurring
$6.7M
Personnel
19
Upfront capital and reserve costs are substantial (~$12.3M) driven by customized humanoid containment, specialized R&D setup, and large contingency reserves; recurring annual operations are elevated (~$6.74M/yr) driven by high-tier staffing, R&D/monitoring, and logistics/MTF readiness.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $12.3M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $6.7M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$6.7M/yr
Normal operational year with scheduled R&D, maintenance, and no major containment incidents; ongoing staffing and monitoring costs only.
routine operations
scheduled R&D activities
no breaches or major incidents
🚨
Minor Incident
$7.7M/yr
Localized containment failure, minor derivative release or equipment failure requiring emergency response, repairs, and limited supplemental medical interventions.
localized structural/mechanical failure
small derivative emergence
limited medical/addiction treatment event
🚨
Major Breach
$14.7M/yr
Major containment breach or coordinated GoI attack producing large-scale derivative releases, extensive damage, casualties, and legal/PR fallout requiring full reserve tapping.
full SCP-7085-A escape or uncontrolled derivative activation
large coordinated GoI assault
catastrophic experimental failure
Personnel
19 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Information Retrieval Specialist | 6 | [#5] 24/7 on-site information-retrieval staffing (2 per shift × 3 shifts = 6 senior personnel). |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 6 | [#6] Security guards: 2per shift × 3 shifts = 6 guards covered in security staffing estimate. |
| Containment Specialist / Technician | 2 | [#6] Two floating containment specialists (restraint/crane operators) included in security/containment staffing. |
| Research Scientist / Senior Analyst | 5 | [#7] Senior analyst/translation & classification team for emitted information (4–6; budgeted as 5). |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide detailed line items and ranges; midpoint selections and assumptions (frequency of moves, reserve sizing, staffing loadings) introduce moderate uncertainty. Large reserves and incident costs are deliberate conservative choices; variability in R&D tempo could move recurring costs materially.