SCP-816
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-816
Expected annual
$1.8M
One-time setup
$2.5M
Annual recurring
$1.8M
Personnel
8
Initial capital requirements are dominated by property acquisition, reinforced containment and contingency funds (~$2.45M one-time). Annual operating costs are dominated by specialist staff wages and legal/cover/monitoring obligations (~$1.77M/yr).
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $2.5M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.8M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.8M/yr
Normal uneventful year with steady-state operations, regular research and maintenance.
routine_operations
no_breach
scheduled_research
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.9M/yr
Localized containment incident or adaptation detected requiring short-term mitigation and repairs.
localized_adaptation
minor_breach
unexpected_equipment_failure
🚨
Major Breach
$4.3M/yr
SCP-816 becomes less dependent on SCP-816-1 or spreads within property requiring Contingency 816-C actions (demolition, mass removal, emergency remediation).
loss_of_dependence_on_clock
rapid_population_expansion
failed_containment
🚨
Catastrophic Breach
$101.8M/yr
Regional/near-regional spread requiring multi-site eradication and long-term ecological remediation (worst-case).
widespread_adaptation
RK-class_ecological_impact
loss_of_local_control
Personnel
8 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Site Director / Executive Staff | 1 | [#6] Senior researcher / site lead responsible for overall program and reporting. |
| Research Scientist | 2 | [#6] Mechanical/robotics researchers focusing on automata study. |
| Technician (Mechanical/Electrical) | 2 | [#6] On-site technicians for maintenance, fabrication and experiments. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 2 | [#6] Two security personnel for site access control and basic escalation. |
| Administrative Staff | 1 | [#6] Administrator/logistics to support cover operations, procurement and liaison. |
Confidence Notes
Estimates derived from analyst ranges and a mid-to-conservative synthesis; Swiss property and staffing costs and contingency sizing introduce material uncertainty. Numbers are reasonable for planning but tail risks (catastrophic remediation) are highly uncertain.