SCP-8227
Unknown
~
medium confidence
SCP-8227
Expected annual
$313K
One-time setup
$544K
Annual recurring
$291K
Personnel
2
Initial one-time setup is approximately $544,500 driven primarily by a recommended emergency/reserve fund and containment hardware; recurring annual operations are about $290,850/year, dominated by the Manna Charitable Foundation contract, legal/PR retainers, and contingency insurance plus logistics for custody rotations.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $544K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $291K/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$291K/yr
Normal operational year with scheduled custody rotations, routine audits, and ongoing contracts with MCF and legal retained; no major incidents.
scheduled custody rotations
routine audits
no public exposure
🚨
Minor Incident
$491K/yr
Localized Veil exposure or unauthorized recording leading to targeted PR/legal response and additional containment measures.
unauthorized recording
small public leak
participant disclosure
🚨
Major Breach
$1.8M/yr
Significant public disclosure or coordinated misuse causing large-scale litigation, suppression operations, and extended emergency response.
mass confessions publicly revealed
coordinated exploitation
major litigation
🚨
Catastrophic Breach
$10.3M/yr
Wide-scale sociopolitical fallout or coordinated global use leading to national/international emergency containment, mass suppression, and potential relocation of artifact and affected populations.
mass, sustained public adoption
nation-level legal/political crisis
coordinated exploitation
Personnel
2 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Site Coordinator / Senior Researcher | 1 | Dr. E. Tsiolis leadership allocation charged at ~10% salary to SCP-8227 operations [#6]. |
| Research Scientist (Junior, 5% FTE) | 1 | Junior researcher assigned at 5% FTE for brainstorming and biannual check-ins [#7]. |
Confidence Notes
Estimates draw from explicit analyst line items and a worked example but include wide ranges for legal/PR/contingency items and emergency reserve sizing; sensitivity to accessible-site count, geographic dispersion, and chosen risk tolerance lowers confidence to medium.