SCP-8771
Keter
~
medium confidence
SCP-8771
Expected annual
$2.7B
One-time setup
$10.1B
Annual recurring
$1.2B
Personnel
800
Corrected estimate: Foundation one-time program capital ≈ $10.06 billion and recurring operational budget ≈ $1.243 billion/year; main Foundation cost drivers are vessel retrofit/R&D, command/gateway centers, contingency reserves, and ongoing medical response and monitoring. Systemic (non-Foundation) economic impact from mass embolisms is far larger (estimated immediate GDP shock ~ $180 billion and recurring productivity/healthcare losses ~ $30 billion/yr). This revision is more granular than the prior report, zeroes infeasible unilateral global concealment costs, and itemizes all multi‑billion line items.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $10.1B
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.2B/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.2B/yr
Routine year of containment operations: continuous surveillance, vessel sorties, R&D and steady medical/monitoring effort with no sudden catastrophic event.
no large breach or escalation
sustained low-to-moderate embolism rate
steady research progress
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.7B/yr
Localized containment failure or limited engagement increases embolism incidence regionally and requires surge medical response and additional field ops.
localized breach
regional embolism spike requiring additional field hospitals
🚨
Major Casualty Event
$12.4B/yr
Sustained combat operations or containment failure producing a mass embolism event (millions of incidental emboli), forcing large-scale Foundation operational surge.
large-scale engagement
mass embolism casualties (multi‑region/multi‑country)
rapid deployment of termination/containment measures
🚨
Research Breakthrough Requiring Scale Up
$201.2B/yr
A major R&D breakthrough or policy decision prompts the Foundation to attempt a rapid, civilization-scale biomedical mitigation program (attempt to separate humans from blood at population scale).
major experimental success enabling scalable biomedical intervention
O5 authorization to attempt population-scale mitigation
international governance agreement to permit wide deployment (if any)
Personnel
800 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 200 | Tactical response, perimeter defense, and transport security; included in security_and_armed_response and staff_wages. |
| Research Scientist | 150 | Hemic-ecology, collapse mechanics, biotech mitigation and HPC/modeling staff included in research_and_monitoring and initial_research_and_lab_setup. |
| Engineer / Maintenance | 120 | Engineers and technicians for vessel, power systems, facilities and exotic hardware maintenance; included in staff_wages and facilities_maintenance. |
| Operator / Metaphysicist | 150 | Vessel operators, metaphysical navigation specialists and domain operatives responsible for firmamental sorties; included in staff_wages. |
| Medical Officer / Clinical Staff | 80 | Emergency response teams, ICU staff for Foundation-run surge hospitals and field teams; costs reflected in medical_emergency_response. |
| Technician / Ordnance Tech | 50 | Ordnance maintenance, weapons testing and simulation technicians; included in exotic_weapons_maintenance and equipment budgets. |
| Administrative / Legal / Liaison | 30 | Admin, limited diplomacy/legal coordination and program management; cover_story_and_legal is zero, but legal/liaison work is captured here and in insurance_reserve_initial. |
| Logistics / Transport Specialists | 20 | Specialized logistics crew for secure transport and rapid deployment; costs included in logistics_and_transport. |
Confidence Notes
This corrected analysis increases granularity and enforces Rules 1–3 versus the prior draft: all multi‑billion Foundation costs are itemized into components; global concealment budgets were zeroed where concealment is infeasible; and truly civilization-scale interventions are not included as baseline one-time costs but are modeled as an extreme scenario. Remaining uncertainty stems from (a) speculative/exotic technology feasibility (exotic power/weapons, firmamental travel), (b) unknown real casualty trajectories (article references 'millions' but timing is unclear), and (c) geopolitical interactions (role of GOC). These drive a medium confidence rating.