SCP-9920
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-9920
Expected annual
$1.3M
One-time setup
$704K
Annual recurring
$1.3M
Personnel
6
Initial one-time setup is moderate (~$700k) driven by secure storage, testing chamber, vehicles, R&D and legal/contingency reserves; recurring annual costs are dominated by staffing, long-term research, and rapid-response capabilities (~$1.28M/yr).
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $704K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.3M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.3M/yr
Normal year with a small, contained program (minimal exposures, monitoring by analog methods, no large incidents).
single-reel containment
no major breach
routine testing and monitoring
🚨
Minor Incident
$1.3M/yr
One or a few localized manifestations outside controlled environments requiring mobilizations, small legal settlements and extra investigation.
monitoring feed failures
single uncontrolled manifestation
small civil/medical payouts
🚨
Major Breach
$3.8M/yr
Multiple subjects require long-term accompaniment/relocation or widespread exposure occurs, triggering large housing, accompaniment, legal and research surge costs.
many civilian exposures
widespread accompaniment requirements
major legal/relocation operations
Personnel
6 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Monitoring Operator / Central Monitor | 4 | [#9] Four monitoring operators to provide 24/7 analog/observer coverage; assumed fully loaded cost ~ $55,000/FTE (total ~$220,000 included in staff_wages). |
| Research Scientist | 1 | [#14, #15, #16, #25] One mid-level research scientist responsible for testing nights, forensics coordination and R&D trials; assumed fully loaded cost ~ $80,000. |
| Administrative Staff | 1 | [#17, #19, #27] One administrative/coordinator for scheduling, procurement, legal liaison and training coordination; assumed fully loaded cost ~ $40,000. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes supply detailed line-item ranges, allowing midpoint estimates, but final costs depend heavily on the number of affected subjects and policy choices (video monitoring vs physical accompaniment), so uncertainty remains in scaling and incident frequency.