SCP-005
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-005
Expected annual
$5.1M
One-time setup
$84.5M
Annual recurring
$4.8M
Personnel
15
Estimated one-time setup and reserve costs are large due to contingency and liability reserves, while recurring annual costs are dominated by staff wages, insurance premiums, and ongoing research/response readiness.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $84.5M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $4.8M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$4.8M/yr
Normal year with no major incidents; routine operations, research, and readiness costs only.
no unauthorized removal
routine testing and maintenance
🚨
Minor Incident
$5.3M/yr
Attempted unauthorized access or small theft attempt requiring forensic response, overtime, temporary transport, and PR/legal engagement.
tamper alarm / attempted breach
localized theft or unauthorized access attempt
🚨
Catastrophic Breach
$54.8M/yr
Full removal/exposure of SCP-005 with public knowledge or use in large-scale crimes requiring major recovery, legal, and remediation operations.
removal from containment
public exposure / large-scale criminal use
Personnel
15 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 6 | [#6] On-site guards covering 24/7 shifts with relief; salaries included in staff_wages. |
| Surveillance Operator | 4 | [#5] 24/7 monitoring operators for CCTV and tamper systems; salaries included in staff_wages. |
| Research Scientist | 2 | [#11, #12] Scientists running experiments and analyzing lock interactions; salaries included in staff_wages (research consumables in research_and_monitoring). |
| Level-4 Personnel / Executive Staff | 1 | [#7] High-clearance approver on-call for removal/decisions; salary/stipend included in staff_wages. |
| Engineer / Maintenance | 1 | [#1, #4] Technical staff for facility, EMP, and surveillance maintenance; salary included in staff_wages. |
| Administrative Staff | 1 | [#10, #15] Records, audit logging coordination, and liaison duties; salary included in staff_wages. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide detailed line-item ranges and clear drivers (good basis), but large uncertainty remains in chosen reserve sizes, incident probabilities, and policy choices (study vs inertization vs secrecy), so aggregate confidence is medium.