SCP-1884
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-1884
Expected annual
$368K
One-time setup
$1.4M
Annual recurring
$357K
Personnel
3
One-time setup and contingency reserves are dominated by a large catastrophic-incident reserve; annual operations are dominated by staff wages, translation/data processing, veterinary/medical care, and research. First-year capital plus contingency: ~USD 1.44M; typical annual operating budget: ~USD 357k driven by personnel, translation, research, and emergency reserves.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $1.4M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $357K/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$357K/yr
Normal operational year with no major incidents; routine grooming, research, and scheduled sessions continue.
no major incidents
scheduled weekly sessions
routine maintenance and research
🚨
Minor Incident
$367K/yr
Small containment incident or medical event requiring extra veterinary/medical care and minor repairs.
minor injury to staff or subjects
localized chamber damage
extra veterinary visits
🚨
Major Injury
$477K/yr
Serious staff injury (e.g., hand severance) requiring surgery, prosthetics, long rehabilitation, and potential legal/medical follow-up.
severe handler injury
surgical interventions and rehabilitation
prosthetics and extended care
🚨
Catastrophic Breach
$1.8M/yr
Large-scale public exposure or containment breach requiring emergency recovery teams, relocation, legal/PR campaigns, and mass operations.
public exposure
multi-team recovery/relocation
major legal/PR operations
Personnel
3 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Level-1 Caretaker | 1 | [#5] Full-time caretaker (1.0 FTE) for daily assistance; salary + benefits included in staff_wages. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 2 | [#6, #7] Minimum two security personnel to oversee weekly sessions; on-call/drills stipend included in staff_wages calculations. |
Confidence Notes
Numerous line items include ranges and frequency ambiguities (e.g., grooming frequency, choice of contracted translators vs. FTE), and catastrophic reserves are intentionally large and uncertain; midpoints were used where ranges were provided and ambiguous items were averaged, producing medium confidence.