SCP-2298
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-2298
Expected annual
$1.9M
One-time setup
$4.2M
Annual recurring
$1.8M
Personnel
10
Initial one-time containment, transport, and R&D/setup are estimated at approximately $4.17M driven by containment construction, specialized R&D, transport, and contingency. Annual recurring operations are roughly $1.84M/yr driven by security and research staffing, utilities, maintenance, and administrative costs.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $4.2M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.8M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.8M/yr
Normal, uneventful year with routine operations, surveys, maintenance, and no major incidents.
routine_surveys
no_breaches
no_media_exposure
🚨
Minor Incident
$2.0M/yr
Localized containment incident or equipment failure requiring repairs, overtime, temporary lockdown, and modest emergency R&D.
sensor_or_camera_fault
localized_manipulation_by_SCP-2298-1
temporary_lockdown_and_repairs
🚨
Major Breach
$2.8M/yr
Significant escalation (mannequin behavior changes, scaling, or partial breach) requiring containment expansion, emergency construction, major R&D and possible contingency drawdown.
mannequin_capability_escalation
containment_system_failure
need_for_additional_modules_or_destruction
🚨
Political Exposure
$2.3M/yr
Leak or diplomatic incident caused by international transport or foreign discovery requiring major legal, PR, relocation or buyout expenses.
international_diplomatic_discovery
public_leak_or_media_exposure
legal_challenges
Personnel
10 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 6 | [#9] 24/7 on-site security presence with 3 shifts (6 FTE assumed) to provide Euclid containment and rapid response; salaries included in staff_wages. |
| Research Scientist | 4 | [#10] Anomalous materials researcher, behavioral/anthropology specialist, lab tech(s) and project lead (3–5 FTE range; model uses 4); salaries included in staff_wages. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide detailed line items and ranges allowing mid-range estimates, but the anomalous behaviors and escalation potential create meaningful uncertainty; contingency/reserve sizing reflects low-frequency high-cost uncertainty.