SCP-2844
Keter
~
medium confidence
SCP-2844
Expected annual
$9.8M
One-time setup
$25.1M
Annual recurring
$9.4M
Personnel
24
Initial one-time setup is approximately $25.15M driven by site acquisition, containment cell construction, jamming arrays, transport and multiple contingency reserves; recurring annual operations are roughly $9.41M driven by staff wages, research, fuel/logistics, and security/intelligence operations.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $25.1M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $9.4M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$9.4M/yr
Normal year with standard operations, maintenance, research and no major incidents.
steady production of paperclips
routine maintenance and research
🚨
Minor Incident
$9.9M/yr
Localized incident (sensor/array damage, small fire, targeted sabotage) requiring repairs, short-term surge staffing and replacement hardware.
small containment breach attempt
targeted sabotage or sensor destruction
🚨
Major Breach
$19.4M/yr
Significant containment breach or sustained attack requiring large-scale emergency response, legal exposure, major remediation and high-cost replacements.
failure of jamming arrays/Faraday cage
coordinated sabotage or AIC-assisted escalation
🚨
Massive Production Spike
$11.4M/yr
Unexpected surge in SCP-2844 production (tonnage-scale), requiring expanded disposal, accelerated environmental remediation and increased logistics.
SCP-2844-A finds new raw material source
SCP-2844-B activation/increased throughput
Personnel
24 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 14 | [#12] ~12 guards to cover three shifts plus 2 supervisors (staffing to maintain 24/7 perimeter and quick reaction). |
| Containment Specialist / Research Scientist / Technician | 10 | [#13] Containment specialists, engineers, AI researchers and technicians responsible for jammers, Faraday maintenance, mechanical work and analysis. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide detailed line-item estimates for most categories, enabling a medium-confidence aggregate. Uncertainty remains due to anomalous behavior, potential scale of paperclip production, and unpredictable breach/remediation costs which could materially change recurring and contingency needs.