SCP-3680
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-3680
Expected annual
$1.8M
One-time setup
$1.7M
Annual recurring
$1.6M
Personnel
19
First-year capital and setup costs are dominated by contingency reserves, legal/setup, and initial research; recurring annual costs are driven primarily by staffing (watch-room monitors and covert agents), medical/legal retainers, and ongoing research/monitoring.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $1.7M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $1.6M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$1.6M/yr
Normal operational year with no major incidents; routine monitoring, staffing, research, and recurring overhead only.
No breach or public exposure
Routine instance retrievals handled in-protocol
🚨
Minor Incident
$2.0M/yr
Localized containment failure or visible instance resulting in limited exposures requiring medical response, overtime, and legal/PR activity.
Single instance observed by multiple students
Small-scale amnestic/medical treatment and local PR/legal action
🚨
Major Breach
$4.2M/yr
Significant public exposure or multisite incident requiring mass amnestic deployment, legal settlements, large-scale remediation, and replenishment of contingency funds.
Widespread public viewing / media exposure
Serious injuries or multiple transformed subjects, lawsuits
Personnel
19 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Watcher / Monitor | 6 | [#1] Baseline watch-room observers (6 FTEs) to provide 24/7 two-person coverage. |
| Surge Watcher (daytime) | 5 | [#2] Additional daytime watchers/equivalent FTEs to meet eight-person requirement during school peak windows. |
| Covert Janitorial Agent / Field Agent | 6 | [#3] On-site disguised agents patrolling hallways during school hours (~6 FTEs). |
| Program Manager / Administrative Staff | 2 | [#24] Program management and administrative support included in recurring admin wages. |
Confidence Notes
Line-item estimates were provided in analyst notes for most categories allowing a grounded budget; however many figures are midpoints or contract-dependent (legal, contingency tolerance, actual incident frequencies), so medium confidence is appropriate.