SCP-3762
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-3762
Expected annual
$2.5M
One-time setup
$6.0M
Annual recurring
$2.4M
Personnel
14
One-time setup and capital expenditure are approximately $6.02M, driven primarily by BSL-3 upgrades, specialized restraint hardware, and vehicles/equipment. Recurring annual costs are approximately $2.405M/yr, driven mainly by staffing (MTF and research), lab operations, monitoring and local liaison/cover operations.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $6.0M
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $2.4M/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$2.4M/yr
Normal year with no major incidents; routine monitoring, staffing, and operations only.
routine monitoring
weekly sampling
no discovery events
🚨
Minor Incident
$2.6M/yr
Localized discovery or small public encounter requiring surge response, amnestic use, spot repairs and extra MTF presence.
civilian discovery
limited structure damage
amnestic deployment
🚨
Active Restraint
$3.6M/yr
Policy decision to actively restrain or seize SCP‑3762 leading to large infrastructure/installation and sustained higher operating costs.
decision to install full restraint
large engineering deployment
sustained high power draw
🚨
Major Breach
$3.9M/yr
Major containment breach or public exposure requiring large‑scale emergency operations, legal/PR costs and infrastructure replacement.
major structural failure
public exposure
large repairs and litigation
Personnel
14 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| On-site Resident Agent | 1 | [#1] Tau‑24‑01 resident agent; local accommodation, hazard pay and on‑call stipend. |
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 8 | [#2] MTF Tau‑24 field team rotational staffing (8 agents) for observation and response. |
| Research Scientist | 2 | [#5] Two full‑time researchers for biomarker/sequence analysis and oversight. |
| Lab Technician | 1 | [#5] One lab technician for sample prep, sequencing runs, histology. |
| Transcription/Archival Staff | 2 | [#17] Photographic capture, transcription, translation (Welsh), and conservation technician support. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide explicit line‑item estimates for nearly every recurring and capital cost, so numerical coverage is good; uncertainty remains around policy choices (active restraint vs passive monitoring), scale ranges on BSL/engineering work, and site‑specific land costs, so a medium confidence rating is appropriate.