SCP-4342
Safe
~
medium confidence
SCP-4342
Expected annual
$302K
One-time setup
$39K
Annual recurring
$166K
Personnel
1.3
Initial one-time setup is modest (~$38.8k) driven by measurement instruments and initial analyses; recurring costs average ~$166k/yr driven primarily by personnel (security and research) and site overhead. Rare adverse incidents can produce very large, potentially catastrophic, episodic expenses.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $39K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $166K/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$166K/yr
Normal, uneventful year with routine monitoring, occasional tests, and baseline staffing using existing site security.
routine testing
no major incidents
incremental site security
🚨
Dedicated Resourcing
$344K/yr
Site assigns a dedicated 24/7 guard rotation and increases research intensity (higher staffing and program budget).
policy decision to dedicate guards
large-scale active research campaign
🚨
Minor Incident
$241K/yr
A testing incident triggers localized loss or damage requiring emergency response, forensics, temporary recontainment and PR/legal work.
adverse testing outcome
localized personnel or asset loss
emergency recontainment
🚨
Catastrophic Breach
$25.2M/yr
Severe containment failure/‘lost’ event (site or regional losses) that requires large-scale mitigation, disinformation, and continuity operations (potential SK-class costs).
site-scale loss
widespread exposure
major disinformation & remediation
Personnel
1.3 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / MTF Agent | 0.3 | [#6] Baseline incremental security equivalent (partial FTE) using existing site personnel; dedicated-guard staffing modeled in scenarios separately. |
| Research Scientist | 0.5 | [#7] One part-time researcher (0.5 FTE) to design and run tests; cost included in staff_wages. |
| Technician / Lab Assistant | 0.5 | [#8] Lab technician support (approx. 0.5 FTE pro-rated) for setup, samples, and experiment execution. |
Confidence Notes
Notes provide specific line items and ranges for most costs (facility, equipment, personnel), so midpoint-based estimates are reasonably grounded; however incident frequencies and severity (especially catastrophic outcomes) are highly uncertain, so overall confidence is medium.