SCP-6950
Euclid
~
medium confidence
SCP-6950
Expected annual
$103K
One-time setup
$38K
Annual recurring
$97K
Personnel
3
Initial one-time setup is modest (~$38k) for covert monitoring hardware and training; ongoing annual costs (~$97k) are driven mainly by readiness/reserve retainer, administrative overhead, research/monitoring activities, and travel/vehicle support.
One-Time Capital Costs
Total: $38K
Annual Recurring Costs
Total: $97K/yr
Cost Scenarios
📊
Baseline
(baseline)
$97K/yr
Normal, uneventful year operating the described monitoring program with retainer/reserve funding and scheduled research activity.
regular patrols and monitoring
scheduled research deployments
no major incidents
🚨
Major Incident
$157K/yr
A significant sighting or escalation requiring activation of rapid-response team, per-activation mobilization, emergency sampling and replacement equipment.
sighting requiring rapid deployment
per-activation specialist mobilization
medical/forensic sample analysis
🚨
Catastrophic Escalation
$347K/yr
Object behavior escalates (increased activity or public exposure) forcing large-scale containment/scale-up, extended MTF support, expanded research and public containment/PR costs.
sustained public exposure
rapid increase in manifestations
need for perimeter containment/MTF deployment
Personnel
3 total
| Role | Count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security Officer / Patrol | 2 | [#1] Two part-time/night patrol personnel assigned to monitoring shifts (twice-weekly coverage). |
| Security Officer / FTE (permanent) | 0 | [#2] Alternative staffing model (permanent FTEs) listed for audit but not included in baseline staffing headcount. |
| Administrative Staff | 1 | [#19] Part-time admin/project management (0.1–0.25 FTE) supporting scheduling, procurement, and HR. |
Confidence Notes
Analyst notes provide detailed ranges; figures are midpoint-based estimates and converted from GBP to USD at ~1.25: 1. Uncertainty remains in staffing model selection, frequency of research deployments, and incident likelihoods; contingency/reserve choices drive much of the annual variance.